We haven’t crunched the math ourselves, but we found the reasoning in this greentechsolar article highly intriguing nonetheless. Here’s the gist of the argument (bolding added for emphasis):
…897 square miles of land [in Kentucky] has been has been flattened by [mountaintop removal coal mining -- MTR]. Therefore, if we merely put PV solar panels on one-fifth of thisalready cleared land, we would supply ALL of the electricity needs forthe entire Commonwealth of Kentucky!
If we covered the entire 897 square miles of cleared MTRspace in Kentucky, we could supply nearly 10% of the electricity needsof the entire U.S.!
Additionally, according to Appalachian Voices, a total of 1,160,000 acres (1,813 square miles) of land has beensurface mined for coal in the central and southern Appalachian region.
To produce that much electricity in one year from PV solar panels inthis region, 8,225 square miles of land would need to be covered.Accordingly, roughly 22% of the electricity consumed in Americacould be provided by PV solar panels if the 1,813 square miles of landcleared by MTR in Appalachia were covered.
The main point we take away from this article is not so much thatsolar panels should be installed on this specific land, although thatcertainly would have a nice poetic justice to it. Instead, the lessonwe believe is worth highlighting is that solar energy has the potentialto power America, with far less land than people might think. In fact, atechnology white paper on solar energy potential by the U.S. Department of the Interior points out that “a desert area in the southwestern United States thatmeasures [100 miles] on a side (0.3% of the land area of the UnitedStates) could theoretically meet the electricity needs of the entirecountry if the solar radiation in that area could be converted toelectricity with 10% efficiency.” And, we’d add, that energy would comewith no blown-up mountains, no bills to foreign dictators, no harmfulemissions in our air and water. That seems like a pretty good trade for our country to make.