In 2007, Applied Materials set goals forimproving its environmental footprint worldwide. These goals were basedon a thorough understanding of current operations made possible throughseveral years of collecting relevant information.
We started with the facilities we knew best — our Silicon Valley, Austin and Israel operations ? but we knew that those locations weren’t thewhole story. We also knew we would grow organically as a business,experience cyclical changes, and make acquisitions that would need to be included in our accounting. We wanted our goals to be realistic, yetmake us stretch.
Goals were set for energy (electricity and natural gas represented by ‘metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents’), water, waste and paperuse reduction. We were practical in what should be focused on andaggressive, by many standards, like our CO2 reductions goals where wecompared our United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Climate Leaders goal to those set by members of that program. In terms ofpaper reduction and waste diversion we set especially aggressive goals.In hindsight, the bar was set a little low for water given how we haveperformed since 2007.
We are well in to 2010 and have completed a rigorous ‘calendar year’look at the data as reported to the Climate Leaders, CarbonDisclosure Project, and the Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition. So howare we doing toward meeting our goals? Take a look at the chart below:
Our 2012 goal for CO2 is a 50,000 tCO2e reduction using 2006 as abaseline. We have committed to an absolute reduction, no matter thebusiness performance. In 2009, we achieved a 32 tCO2e reduction from2006, putting Applied 65% of the way to our 2012 goal.
We set a 10% water reduction goal and have reduced our usage by 17%worldwide.
We set an 80% waste diversion goal and have been at about 85% forseveral years and expect to reach 90% now that composting efforts havebeen instituted in our Bay Area and Austin sites, with other locationsplanned.
Our goal of a 50% paper reduction by 2008 has been met and we are at60% reduction using 2007 as our baseline. To date, just in Santa Clara,30,000 reams of paper have been saved, a stack of paper almost one milehigh.
This isn’t the end of this story; we have more work to do. Thelow-hanging fruit has been achieved and now we need to look for otherways to reduce our environmental footprint. With the implementation ofGreen Teams at many of our major locations, it may be time tore-evaluate and set new goals!
Post a comment with your ideas on other ways to help reduce ourenvironmental footprint.